Early engineering review build

Requirement quality and safety assurance review.

Upload project artifacts, create graph snapshots, and review concrete findings: vague requirements, missing metadata, traceability gaps, release blockers, and snapshot-to-snapshot progress.

BaselineCase is not a certification tool. It is an engineering review aid for checking whether the findings are useful, wrong, noisy, or missing important context.

Workflow

What the user does.

  1. 1 Upload documents

    XLSX, XLS, CSV, TSV, JSON, JSONL, CycloneDX CDX JSON, HTML, HTM, Markdown, MD, RST, ADOC, DOCX, PDF, TXT, LOG, and DAT.

  2. 2 Optionally review ingested data

    Raw nodes, links, evidence rows, and provenance are available when the results need explanation.

  3. 3 Review requirement quality

    Vagueness, atomicity, testability, metadata completeness, and missing verification evidence.

  4. 4 Track safety assurance progress

    Release blockers, traceability gaps, unresolved safety requirements, and snapshot deltas.

Examples

Output from ingested open-source repositories.

Example projects show the kind of review queue a signed-in user sees for their own projects.

CodethinkLabs

safety-monitor quality screening

Commit ca6ae3c · 151 files · 1,193 nodes · 1,851 edges

Repository
47.2avg quality
74requirements
1unresolved refs
341critical findings

Requirement quality

Safety assurance insights

    Artifact Outcome Priority
    Local app

    Desktop build.

    Run the app locally with the bundled backend, SQLite database, and local document store.

    View all installers and checksums

    Try it on a small sample.

    Most useful feedback: false positives, missed links, unclear findings, unsupported formats, and outputs that would or would not help a review.

    Start for free (no credit card)